' From "Daily Mail" 8th October, 1946: It was held by Judge Crosthwaite at Liverpool County Court that the cat has a right to prowl.
J. E. Withers tenant of a ground floor flat in St. George’s Road, Hightown, Liverpool, sought an injunction against her tenant of the flat above, to keep the cat under control and claimed damages. For Mrs. C.’s cat, it was said, got into Mrs. W. ‘s, fiat ate mincepies and fish, got on to a bed, and scratched the bedpost. For the plaintiff it was contended that a cat was in the same category as a dog, and it was the owner’s duty to keep it under control. For Mrs. C. it was argued that an owner was not liable for a cat’s actions "when trespassing and following its natural propensities." Judgement was given for Mrs. C. with costs. '
The point of the above quoted article is that it is up to HER to keep the cat out and not for YOU to stop it visiting as cats have a RIGHT to prowl.
Thats now a law.
I would send her a letter dumping the problem in her lap by saying that you CANNOT be held responsible if your cat visits her house as she continues to feed it and that you do not want any further contact about this matter or you will class it as harrassment.
Then forget the whole thing and just let the cat do as he wishes.
