Author Topic: nuclear power plants.  (Read 92158 times)

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #105 on: November 01, 2012, 04:17:21 pm »
right back on topic.... ::) ;)
 
whatever happened to tesla?
 
http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml

RUSTYME

  • Joined Oct 2009
.
« Reply #106 on: November 01, 2012, 04:23:28 pm »
He died mate .

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #107 on: November 01, 2012, 04:25:02 pm »
after that mate.

RUSTYME

  • Joined Oct 2009
.
« Reply #108 on: November 01, 2012, 04:29:16 pm »
They found ways to make leccy that made them millions , that we couldn't do ourselves .

in the hills

  • Joined Feb 2012
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #109 on: November 01, 2012, 05:44:01 pm »
ditw ..... Are you saying that we won't give up nuclear because we need the uranium to produce nuclear weapons? I don't know much about this subject. I thought we stopped producing our own nuclear weapons in the 50's and bought them from America.  ???

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #110 on: November 01, 2012, 06:05:02 pm »
yes.
 
it is used for weaponry. look up depleted uranium.
 
its used to head rounds of ammunition, from smallfire to tankbusters. it 'sharpens' on impact so cuts through metal. i might be wrong on this but i think its the standard us ammo now. being used all over the world in vast quantities.
 
 
 
from wiki.
                World depleted uranium inventory           
CountryOrganizationEstimated DU stocks
(tonnes)
Reported
United StatesDOE
480,000        [/t][/t] 2002
RussiaFAEA
460,000        [/t] 1996
FranceAreva NC
190,000        [/t] 2001
United KingdomBNFL
30,000        [/t] 2001
United Kingdom
Germany
Netherlands
URENCO
16,000        [/t] 1999
JapanJNFL
10,000        [/t] 2001
ChinaCNNC
2,000        [/t] 2000
South KoreaKAERI
200        [/t] 2002
South AfricaNECSA
73        [/t] 2001
SingaporeDSO National Laboratories
60        [/t] 2007
TOTAL

 
 
 
that didnt work, hey, the total in TONNES of du in the world as 2008 was      1,188,273
« Last Edit: November 01, 2012, 06:11:49 pm by deepinthewoods »

northfifeduckling

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Fife
    • North Fife Blog
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #111 on: November 01, 2012, 06:12:47 pm »
I'm with Rusty, the end is nigh :eyelashes: :&>

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #112 on: November 01, 2012, 06:20:07 pm »
'' In a three week period of conflict in Iraq during 2003 it was estimated over 1000 tons of depleted uranium munitions were used.''
 
 
do you think theyve gone round and picked it all up?? ;D

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #113 on: November 01, 2012, 06:28:13 pm »
In early 2004, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service attributed birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to depleted uranium poisoning.[98][99] Children of British soldiers who fought in wars in which depleted uranium ammunition was used are at greater risk of suffering genetic diseases such as congenital malformations, commonly called "birth defects," passed on by their fathers. In a study of U.K. troops, "Overall, the risk of any malformation among pregnancies reported by men was 50% higher in Gulf War Veterans (GWV) compared with Non-GWVs."
 
 
sorry to post after my own post but i sort of thought everybody knows that we used du? it was in cluster bombs, landmines, evrything really!

MikeM

  • Joined Jul 2011
  • NW Devon
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #114 on: November 01, 2012, 06:43:49 pm »
that wasn't the question that was asked though.

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #115 on: November 01, 2012, 06:47:30 pm »
sorry mikem, could you explain, what have i missed?

MikeM

  • Joined Jul 2011
  • NW Devon
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #116 on: November 01, 2012, 07:31:15 pm »
"ditw ..... Are you saying that we won't give up nuclear because we need the uranium to produce nuclear weapons? I don't know much about this subject. I thought we stopped producing our own nuclear weapons in the 50's and bought them from America"
 
this was the question that was asked. We know that we manufacture DU weapons, but the question that was asked was do you think that's why we won't give up nuclear generation.

deepinthewoods

  • Guest
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #117 on: November 01, 2012, 07:47:53 pm »
yes.
 
the uk is a major supplier of arms.

escapedtothecountry

  • Joined Feb 2012
  • www.escapedtothecountry.com
    • Escaped to the Country
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #118 on: November 01, 2012, 09:21:15 pm »
yes.
 
the uk is a major supplier of arms.


Is that why Finland is embarking upon having nuclear energy?

Small Farmer

  • Joined Jan 2012
  • Bedfordshire
Re: nuclear power plants.
« Reply #119 on: November 01, 2012, 10:32:04 pm »
So back onto the renewables, National Grid's green forecast which shows some economic growth suggests 30GW of wind power generation by 2020.


That's TEN times the current output, but still less than 30% of the total.  That is an awful lot of wind turbines.  And don't forget that the generators get a guaranteed rate, so it certainly isn't going to be too cheap to meter!


We're faced with a rather unhappy set of choices.  That's why I'm open to reconsidering nuclear, though if fusion showed any signs of progress that would help.  I've visited Culham a fair few times, and success seems decades away still.

Being certain just means you haven't got all the facts

 

© The Accidental Smallholder Ltd 2003-2025. All rights reserved.

Design by Furness Internet

Site developed by Champion IS