I rather think the planners would try to refute that. What are 'household facilities'? You could have an agri building with a kitchenette, toilet, cupboards, table, chairs, a heater of some ort, and even a bed in it. Could you then claim it's a home?
Yes if it had toilet bath/shower installed if they did not the gov planning inspector would
[member=10673]SallyintNorth[/member] my reading is correct if criteria is met
I had a enforcement notice served council wanted facilities removing gov planning inspector commented on what would constitute C3 residential use
"18. It is unclear whether the Council consider that the term ‘residential use’ amounts to ‘dwelling house’ as defined by Class C3 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. The bay at the northern end of the building contains a sofa which can also be utilised as a bed, kitchen units, a wardrobe, a cooker, a microwave, a kettle, a fridge freezer and a sink with running water. Heating is provided throughout the building through radiators linked to a wood-burning boiler which is situated in a lean-to at the rear. There are no toilet, shower or bathing facilities at the site.
19. Thus, the facilities available are sufficient to provide heated shelter, cooking facilities and a place to sleep on the sofa. It is clear that the appellant has, on occasion, stayed overnight at the site but,
to my mind, toilet and bathing/ showering facilities are essential for day to day existence. The lack of those basic facilities would be likely to discourage prolonged stays at the site and their
absence indicates that the building is not equipped with a full range of essential services to enable it to function as a dwelling house."