Following on from the Fife theft thread...
I have only ever had one horse micro-chipped, and he is now living elsewhere. The ones I have now are not. I have considered getting them done, but have decided against it on the grounds that the chip register is fragmented due to several companies offering the service, and few, if any, of them seeming to submit their records to a central archive. If, as I did, one loses the certificate, bar code, and forgets the name of the company involved, and can't pass that vital information on to the police/marts/horsewatch schemes, it seems that the chip will be of little use in aiding the retrieval of a stolen horse. Even with photos and an accurate description, the horse's recovery still requires someone with a scanner to be in the right place at the right time.
Micro-chips can 'migrate' to other parts of the body, which makes them difficult to detect and read, and there is even the potential for them to be removed altogether. I have decided instead to have each of them freeze branded in the hope that it may be more beneficial as a thief deterent. Anyone who is interested can cast an eye over a freeze brand, and the more eyes on them as they move around the country means that there is greater potential for a stolen horse to be detected. There is no need for a particular person with a scanner to be involved.
Since July 2009, all foals now have to be passported and micro-chipped, yet there seems to be no provision made for a choice between chipping and freeze branding, according to the preference of the owner. I accept that not everyone would want a branded horse, and that may be a focal point if such a horse were offered for sale; it may even be detrimental to the price of the horse. However, for those of us who have breeding stock, retain youngsters, and want our horses to have a visual display of responsible ownership, branding may be the preferred option.
As the law stands, as far as I know, we must chip and, if we wish to brand, that has to be additional and an extra incurred cost.
Can anyone tell me if the various companies who offer either option are pooling their information effectively, with a central archive body such as NED, or is it all still a mess?
Come to think of it, NED is a mess too...isn't it?