How much evaporation there is will depend on the surface area. How much as a proportion of the total volume will be.....haha, I'm no good at maths, but I'm sure there's a formula somewhere.
We have two small ponds, one is in the flower garden and is lined with butyl but leaks. It was completed about 3 years ago and was rapidly colonised by some very interesting wee beasties - once we found a tiddler sized fish - no idea how it got there, but the dragon larvae soon had it.
The second is smaller and in the orchard. It was built for the ducks but we have none now. It is lined with concrete as we are on very free draining soil. Both are topped up all the time by water collected on a large barn roof. Not only does this keep the water level up, except in long dry spells, but it also keeps a degree of through flush which helps both the water quality and the oxygenation. In spite of the concrete liner, this one is very much a wildlife pond, and includes some long tuft grass and plants left wild and shaggy around the edges for insects and ground bees. I agree with Bazzais - you need to see your pond in a number of summers as well as the winter, to know how low the level will get.
Your proposed depths sound great - something for every type of water plant and to keep the fish from freezing in the cold, and the water from getting too hot in the summer.
I'm all for wildlife ponds - they give so much pleasure and are a huge boost for all sorts of wildlife, including non-aquatics.
Sorry - I know nothing about planning requirements, although I think they tend to vary a bit from area to another. Our planning dept seems to leave us alone.