Fleecewife - Im going for genetic diversity, chasing phenotype reminds me of the texels -n how the breed soc chase a bigger chest and head, basically breeding for difficult lambing, vs looking at the new z texels which are the opposite - bred for ease! Makes me angry!
I dont give a damn about show ring appearance and have been critiqued for it in the past - but to me Hebs should be long lived (10+ years) touch, thrive on low or no inputs but pasture and hay and lamb without problems and have good feet, mouths and be good mothers - and be tough as iron in all weather.
Ive been to view too many heb flocks given food all year round, nuts in summer, lick blocks all the time, and what that does is allow week lines which should not be bred, to thrive, and weaken the breed - even more so as Ive seen this at 100ft above sea level - and this means soft sheep are thriving, while a heb with genes for hardiness may struggle under such a soft system, getting fat, scouring etc and as such not breed so well, so perversely many breeders are screwing the breed up imo, by giving their sheep an easy ride, and breeding for appearance - sadly making future hebs potentially a breed of old-world looking black sheep, adapted to live on year round supplements, adlib feeding and sheltered lambing -
I belive Hebs should be the opposite - Hardy little buggers, good mothers, thrive on grass alone (hay in bad weather), live out all year, lamb easily, good feet, good mouths and generally be a strong and healthy breed - compared to so many of the soft molly-coddled show-ring flocks which over time are breeding narrow lines for appearance and thus loosing the attributes that count. (I have brought from breeders like this who pride themselves on how good pedigree they are - and these ewes melt without inputs, struggle, and got twin lamb, then bad feet, repeatedly on all from the same set - Obviously WEAK genetics, but perfect appearance!
Beauty is a) in the eye of the beholder, b) only skin deep