Author Topic: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle  (Read 15761 times)

Herdygirl

  • Joined Sep 2011
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2013, 10:52:36 pm »
I also agree with SteveHants.

Buffy the eggs layer

  • Joined Jun 2010
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2013, 10:09:56 am »
 :roflanim: .
 

Fronhaul

  • Joined Jun 2011
    • Fronhaul Farm
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #17 on: May 22, 2013, 10:46:20 am »
Have to say we have had a hideous year.  I do have some sheep in great condition but more who are lacking weight and have really struggled.  And that is after introducing a little and often feeding regime which meant we were out in all weathers 3 times a day.  And to me it says it all that the mills could not keep pace with demand and the result was a shortage of sheep food.  Never before have I seen the local Farmers co-ops with empty storage sheds.

So far as the timing of your lambing is concerned speak to your vet please.  I know Schmallenberg may not have reached you yet but the probability is that it will.  And the general experience in this area is that it was the early lambers who were worst affected.

I do show and like Feldar I regard it as a  shop window for us.  But I would much rather accept that my lambs are not going to do well in the show ring, particularly early in the year, and concentrate on showing the shearlings, than place additional pressure and risks on my ewes. 

And sadly, in common with many in this area, I lost sheep during the last few horrible months.

Foobar

  • Joined Mar 2012
  • South Wales
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2013, 11:55:01 am »

I would argue that showing has been to the detriment of most breeds - even the rare ones and especially those which have something to offer the national flock in terms of thrift (primitives and so on) and ease of lambing as these cannot be judged for in the ring.
I'm with Steve.  Sheep need to be "fit-for-purpose".  If their purpose is to look pretty then that's fine, but if their purpose is to be a sustainable resource for meat or milk then that's another.  I don't think plying sheep with man-made feeds and chemicals and medicines are a sustainable activity in the long term.
I wouldn't choose an animal from a show ring, I would want to know the flock health history and the management and culling regime that the farmer uses.  Showing should be more like ... "Here's my lovely looking animal, and here's it's "service history" that proves that it is as good as it looks". (sorry for the car analogy!)

feldar

  • Joined Apr 2011
  • lymington hampshire
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2013, 12:38:12 pm »
I would agree with all that is said. The showing is a hobby BUT it does highlight to the public in general what breeds there are about and brings it all out there for them to see. It would be a great shame to have an agricultural show without so many great breeds of sheep! it would just be a Sunday market.
I think now the trend is going away from breeding sheep that are stuffed with grub. Yes it does still happen of course but certainly in the Hamp society we have worked long and hard to re-educate breeders from doing this, and EBVs are a big part of the Hamps and other societies' remit for being " Fit for Purpose"
At Devon this year the fattest certainly didn't win!!
There is no point in buying a ram which melts the minuit you get it home.
I would personally be very suprised if someone wanted to buy my stock without a farm visit first.
That said we lamb early, yes to get the show team but also to catch that first Easter market and are quite often rung up by buyers who want to know when our lambs will be ready. We then lamb again a commercial flock in March /April to a much less intensive system. So it's really what works for you and on your ground.
I think anyone who has stuck out 2012/2013 needs a huge pat on the back i can't remember there being a year like it, though my husband tells me 1963 was a terrible year too, but i will just have to take his word for it :-J  my mum was practising at producing me then :D

ZaktheLad

  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Thornbury, Nr Bristol
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2013, 12:41:08 pm »
I think the figure I read recently of 20,000 sheep over the norm being sent for disposal this year as a result of death on farms, speaks for itself with regards to how hard both last year and early this years weather has taken affect on livestock.   Showing any type of animal can surely only be seen as a hobby/enjoyable pastime and I can not believe that there are many people who show their animals believing that it is an integral part of marketing their animals. Having shown both dogs and horses over many years, it is certainly not something that has ever entered my mind - I just enjoyed showing them and the preparation beforehand, but it was a hobby and nothing more than that.    There is not one farmer I have spoken in my area who can say they have had a good time of it over the past year - one farmer I know lost 60 lambs to SBV and then a load of his ewes contracted something from the silage they were eating, and he lost a load more.    The grass has not really grown - even now, it is in very short supply where I live and even the trees are still struggling to come out in to leaf.  My ewes will be getting an extra month or so before the next tupping to give them a bit more recovery time and I am not above keeping back from tupping at all if she is in a very poor state and then putting her in the following season.   The welfare of my animals is paramount to me as I am sure it is to all.

landroverroy

  • Joined Oct 2010
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2013, 08:22:26 pm »
Hi,
     has anyone adjusted their lambing cycle from march lambing to january lambing? I would like to lamb earlier next year than I did last year but I'm thinking I will have to do it incrementally over a couple of years.
   I want to use one of this years ram lambs on my shearlings and as he was born at the end of march Im thinking that the end of Sept would be the earliest thet he would be ready. Equally the ewes that lambed this year at the end of march will need to wean the lambs off, dry up and then be flushed so probably end of Oct?
Any thoughts? :thinking:

Wow - after some well thought out and helpful (to me anyway!) comments and advice on early lambing, this post seems to have changed to sheer bigotry :rant: . I always thought the idea of a forum was to gain from other people's experience and advice and that one was then free to make up one's own mind. So why should anyone rubbish Buffy's desire to show as an intregal part of her marketing stategy? It may not fit in with your ideals or even ability, but surely there's no need to belittle it,  just because it isn't your "thing". :thinking:
Anyway, I just thought I'd add my 2pennorth.
I would agree Buffy - your March born lamb will be far too young  to use for your purposes this year; but then I think you'd already come to that conclusion.
I, like you, have not had any detrimental effects on my flock due to the bad winter, so really it is fairly irelevant to your proposals.
I believe you produce Ryelands, a terminal sire, and so even if you didn't  show them, then I would think it beneficial to bring your lambing forward so that you can sell your rams as lambs, for use in their year of birth. That way you would achieve the same price as for a shearling, and it would save you keeping them over for another year. And good luck with the showing - it's a great way of showcasing your stock. I can't believe people still think you have to stuff food in and produce an obese animal in order to get a prize. The prize goes not to the fattest, but to that with the best shape for its particular job, and shown in prime condition due to OPTIMUM not MAXIMUM feeding. (And I have the cup and rosettes to back this up!)
Stevehants - I believe you have Wiltshire Horns, or Easycare or similar, which are a maternal breed and therefore a different ballgame altogether, and you would probably not gain to the same extent by lambing earlier or showing. In fact clearly from your posts, it would appear that your land and possibly your facilities are not ideal for either. 
Rules are made:
  for the guidance of wise men
  and the obedience of fools.

sabrina

  • Joined Nov 2008
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #22 on: June 17, 2013, 08:59:46 pm »
Never shown sheep so excuse me if I am talking rubbish but if I was judging I would not be looking for a pretty one. should it not be one that stands out as being a very good example of the breed. Good body etc,

SteveHants

  • Joined Aug 2011
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2013, 10:18:35 pm »
Stevehants - I believe you have Wiltshire Horns, or Easycare or similar, which are a maternal breed and therefore a different ballgame altogether, and you would probably not gain to the same extent by lambing earlier or showing. In fact clearly from your posts, it would appear that your land and possibly your facilities are not ideal for either.


Yes - but I am a ram buyer. My commercial flock (easycares etc) go to a terminal sire (currently SufTex). If you read my original response, it did answer the OP -  I would nor bring my lambing cycle forward coming off the back of 2012, especially if the only purpose for doing it was to produce animals for showing, which, like I said, is nice to do, but that is all it is. I was then told that 'showing sheep is an integral part of promoting rare and minority breeds as well as marketing flocks with stock for sale'. I disagree with this statement and I think I posted a fairly comprehensive answer as to why.


I expect my commercial lambs to finish off grass, because this is the most profitable way to produce lambs, and I am running a business, the purpose of which is to maximise my margins.  I, like more and more ram buyers do not want to buy terminal sires produced for the show ring. I will buy as follows (accepting, saldy that I cannot buy an outdoor bred terminal sire, apart from if I went to Innovis, I think) - I will use word of mouth to find who has a good reputation for producing terminal sires on grass only, I will then go to the farm and see how the system looks compared to mine (I have to trust that the ram breeder isn't feeding, but obviously, if I go in april and I see creep feeders out, then I will be walking away). I will then and only then look at the animals, having picked a few I like from the EBV sheet, I will then narrow my choice down whilst looking at the  rams. More and more people are buying rams like this preciseley because buying show rams is a lottery, and so many buyers are having rams melt away/produce slow-growing offspring as soon as they are run commercially.


I'm sorry if you think that I am bigoted for disagreeing with the notion that showing is an important part of producing terminal sire breeds, but I do - and the purposes of an internet forum are to discsuss ones views.

You will also note that quite a few people agreed with me.

shygirl

  • Joined May 2013
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #24 on: June 17, 2013, 11:30:17 pm »
just an idea - why not breed your best ewes early in hope for showring beasts, and then breed majority of the flock later on?

landroverroy

  • Joined Oct 2010
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #25 on: June 17, 2013, 11:38:47 pm »
Never shown sheep so excuse me if I am talking rubbish but if I was judging I would not be looking for a pretty one. should it not be one that stands out as being a very good example of the breed. Good body etc,

Exactly Sabrina - you have nicely described the whole point of showing, which is to emphasise whatever you would expect in any breed.
So for a terminal sire the animal should be a good size and shape, and I'm sorry Steve but a poorly finished animal that has not had sufficient food to show its potential is not going to impress anybody. If the animal is going to be your flock ram you want to see that it is capable of siring lambs that will fetch a good price in market. You don't want to just guess that its genetics are right - you want to see it for yourself. Else why would you choose one ram over the one in the pen next door, or on the next farm? 
For a maternal breed, you are more concerned about its udder, its milkiness and its ability to produce twins. This, I presume Steve, is why you have chosen Lleyns in your breeding. And I don't believe anyone would fault you there.   
Now I've always believed that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and we all have different experiences, which are worth sharing with others. I can also see why a lot of people agree with you because you have the ability to be very convincing.
But how can you spout off about EBVs (estimated breeding value) when you have cross bred ewes and use crossbred (SuffTex) rams?  It is perfectly obvious that showing is entirely irrelevant to your system of production. I am afraid you do not count as a ram buyer in the accepted sense of the word.
Now I am not  knocking your system. It clearly works for you. But that does not make you an expert on the way Buffy chooses to produce her sheep. So it would seem unfair to condemn anyone who wishes to show their animals when you don't really seem to understand what it's all about.
I notice in an earlier post you mentioned Steve that you had an interest  in genetics. (Forgive me Buffy for veeering slightly from your question.) So you know that the genetics of an animal are what it passes on to its offspring. The breeder will feed up an animal so that its genetics and potential are obvious to the potential buyer, like polishing a car before you sell it. The fact that you don't like to see an animal that has been fed extra, in no way affects its genetic ability to produce good lambs nor does it mean that you cannot fatten these lambs entirely on grass.
 
Rules are made:
  for the guidance of wise men
  and the obedience of fools.

ScotsGirl

  • Joined Dec 2009
  • Wiltshire
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #26 on: June 18, 2013, 01:34:22 pm »
Well I keep saying I am going to lamb later due to lack of grass but I find my lambs are usually better when born February. My early lambs this year are huge. Next year however I am considering housing for last month to save the ground.


I always keep newborns in for a few days until strong and will bring back in during early weeks if necessary but that's because I can. I may just be lucky but I can't believe how many people are losing stock due to weather and poor feeding.


I don't think you can compare commercial and rare breeds. They have quite different requirements and I agree with Steve on this, for once! Sorry haven't managed to get over to see your setup, things a bit chaotic here.

SteveHants

  • Joined Aug 2011
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #27 on: June 18, 2013, 01:42:58 pm »
So for a terminal sire the animal should be a good size and shape, and I'm sorry Steve but a poorly finished animal that has not had sufficient food to show its potential is not going to impress anybody.


Yes, but this food should consist of the same food that I am going to feed its progeny - ie grass. This is why I buy off-farm.


If the animal is going to be your flock ram you want to see that it is capable of siring lambs that will fetch a good price in market. You don't want to just guess that its genetics are right - you want to see it for yourself. Else why would you choose one ram over the one in the pen next door, or on the next farm? 
For a maternal breed, you are more concerned about its udder, its milkiness and its ability to produce twins. This, I presume Steve, is why you have chosen Lleyns in your breeding. And I don't believe anyone would fault you there.   


Yes, I but maternal rams to breed replacements, using maternal ebvs as a tool. I buy terminal sire rams to produce fat lambs, using terminal EBVs as a tool. 


But how can you spout off about EBVs (estimated breeding value) when you have cross bred ewes and use crossbred (SuffTex) rams?  It is perfectly obvious that showing is entirely irrelevant to your system of production. I am afraid you do not count as a ram buyer in the accepted sense of the word.


I've lost you here - both maternal and terminal breeders use ebvs. I chose SufTexs because I like a bit of hybrid vigour, but I could have equally bought either a Suffolk or  Texel off the same breeder. I also looked at Meatlinc and Charrolais before deciding. Signet uses EBVs to compare across breeds, which is why they are a useful index. See this promotional chart from the meatlinc breed website here:


I don't know why I don't count as a ram buyer to you. I buy rams. Most keepers of maternal flocks buy rams and are usually who the ram breeders target. I know I don't have many ewes compared to most sheep farmers, maybe thats why - I have 300 commercial ewes, how many would I need to be a ram buyer in the 'true sense of the word'? 500? 1000?


Most of the terminal breed societies are coming on-side to EBVS because the way people are buying rams is changing - the show ring has let down so many producers with rams that melt or whos progeny are slow to grow because their genetic potential had been masked by the sires being fed on concentrates.
Here are a few links:


http://www.meatlinc.co.uk/buying-rams/


http://www.charollaissheep.com/sire_ref_scheme.htm


http://www.texel.co.uk/thebreed/prt_index_updates.php


http://www.easyrams.co.uk/


Now I am not  knocking your system. It clearly works for you. But that does not make you an expert on the way Buffy chooses to produce her sheep. So it would seem unfair to condemn anyone who wishes to show their animals when you don't really seem to understand what it's all about.
I notice in an earlier post you mentioned Steve that you had an interest  in genetics. (Forgive me Buffy for veeering slightly from your question.) So you know that the genetics of an animal are what it passes on to its offspring. The breeder will feed up an animal so that its genetics and potential are obvious to the potential buyer, like polishing a car before you sell it. The fact that you don't like to see an animal that has been fed extra, in no way affects its genetic ability to produce good lambs nor does it mean that you cannot fatten these lambs entirely on grass.


I didn't condemn anyone for wanting to show - I only stated that it was a fun hobby and perhaps if her ewes had had a hard time in 2012, 2013 would not be the best time to bring lambing forward. I was then told in no uncertain terms that unlike almost everyone elses sheep I know (and I live in an area not badly affected by the weather in 2012) because her sheep had plenty of grass and sheds concs etc etc and also that "showing was an integral part of sheep farming", which I disagree with, and I think I stated pretty concisley why that was.




Steve that you had an interest  in genetics. (Forgive me Buffy for veeering slightly from your question.) So you know that the genetics of an animal are what it passes on to its offspring. The breeder will feed up an animal so that its genetics and potential are obvious to the potential buyer, like polishing a car before you sell it. The fact that you don't like to see an animal that has been fed extra, in no way affects its genetic ability to produce good lambs nor does it mean that you cannot fatten these lambs entirely on grass.


How on earth can you possibly say that - if the animal itself hasn't been fed on grass only then you have no idea how its genetics will perform when it (or its offspring) are only fed grass - what happens is in effect you are masking the effects of those genetics. A ram that grows well on concs may not grow well on grass and vice versa, and before I part with x hundred quid, I want to be damn sure that the animal fits my system. And, if your claim was the case then buyers wouldn't be looking to buy off farm as many are now choosing to do  -  they would simply continue to buy from the big breed auctions etc.


And that is  where we come back to EBVs. Naturally, the flaw in ebvs is that you have no idea how the rams were fed to achieve the figures on the ebv sheet. This is why you have to visit the farm.


On a wider note - as the population of the world increases, we have more and more mouths to feed with less and less inputs available, so it makes sense to work towards eliminating concentrate feeding wherever possible.   Or, in slightly more selfish terms - buying concentrates eats into your margin, and the prices are set to increase and to continue to do so. If farmers cannot make a suitable margin, then they will cease to be able to make a living.


Why do I care about all of this, and why am I bothering on a 'smallholder' forum?


Firstly - I consider a 300 ewe flock to be pretty small, so therefore I consider myself to be a smallholder of sorts, and I see no reason why I should not run my flock along commercial lines and, more importantly, why doing so should not make me money. I can't afford for it not to.


Secondly, there are a lot of small flocks producing terminal sires out there and given that me (and people like me, although perhaps with more sheep) are your customers, it makes sense to illustrate what your customers are actually looking for.

Marches Farmer

  • Joined Dec 2012
  • Herefordshire
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #28 on: June 18, 2013, 01:50:18 pm »
I view EBV's with a good deal of scepticism - thought I'd try a ram with good all round scores for the first time this year and his lambs have been no better, or worse, than those of any other ram I've picked by eye off farm, except he's thrown 55% ram lambs in the Southdowns and 90% in the Badger Face Xs, instead of the usual 45% ish!  If I select a ram lamb to grow on for breeding it's always a twin that's been healthy, vigorous and has excellent conformation.  Since I only keep ewes that are also that way and lamb without assistance and are excellent, milky and long-lived mothers, I have to assume that these traits, generation on generation, will become increasingly fixed in the flock.

SteveHants

  • Joined Aug 2011
Re: Thoughts on changing the lambing cycle
« Reply #29 on: June 18, 2013, 01:54:10 pm »
I don't think you can compare commercial and rare breeds. They have quite different requirements and I agree with Steve on this, for once! Sorry haven't managed to get over to see your setup, things a bit chaotic here.


Thats okay! You are welcome anytime - it'll be a bit quiet after shearing the wooly ones so you can pop over then if you like.


Re Rare breeds: Interestingly, a friend of mine has been heavily involved in the Wilts Horn Breed Soc - and has been driving the move to performance record and the breed has come on in leaps and bounds in terms of mothering, milkiness etc to the point where there are now numerous large flocks of Wilts Horns run on a commercial basis, and this was a breed that was pretty rare until quite recently. He also noted the rift between those who show those who don't within the breed, noting that several multiple show-winners from 'wining bloodlines' consistently fall at the bottom of the performance charts...... ;D


I think something similar happened with Hampshire Downs, pulling them from relative decline to one of the most popular terminal breeds.


It just seems to me that whenever showing/judging animals on their appearance on one day of the year becomes central to a breed of anything, it seems to suffer because form becomes instantly more important than function.

 

© The Accidental Smallholder Ltd 2003-2025. All rights reserved.

Design by Furness Internet

Site developed by Champion IS