Author Topic: silly question - probably  (Read 6789 times)

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
silly question - probably
« on: June 01, 2011, 09:10:29 pm »
I'm thinking of getting some birds for meat; is there any reason why I should keep the meat birds separate from my layers?

Obviously if I end up with a cock I might get fertilized eggs, but is that a problem?

mab

Sandy

  • Guest
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2011, 09:48:16 pm »
My meat birds started off with the others but we far less mobile and kept almost where the run was so as the weather got colder, I put them into the run, Hubbards (thats what I had) seem to do very little so I felt they were better in a smaller area. We ate them before they were fully mature not sure how old but they tasted very nice and were big as well.

Not sure what others think but I cannot see why they cannot be together!!

little blue

  • Joined Jun 2009
  • Derbyshire
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2011, 09:51:18 pm »
you're better off feeding the laying hens Layers pellets/mash, with just treats of corn or whatever...

... the meat birds could be fed corn, or finishers pellets, or whatever.
so from this p.o.v. you need to be able to feed them separately.

fertilised eggs can be eaten, assuming they are fresh & kept cool!

We had kept all the young birds together, fed on Layers & some corn mixed in... and ate the cockerels when they became noisy, but if we were raising some just for meat, I imagine its worth thinking about you're feeding them - ours were'nt exactly overburdened with flesh!   (but delicious!)
Little Blue

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2011, 10:57:02 pm »
Thanks,

That sets my mind at rest. I actually feed the ex-batts a mix of corn & layers pellets anyway.

all I've got to do now is choose a low maintenence meaty breed and get some eggs I suppose.  ::)

Hatty

  • Joined Feb 2011
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2011, 11:09:39 pm »

fertilised eggs can be eaten, assuming they are fresh & kept cool!


And supposedly lower in cholesterol than un-fertilised eggs 
How long did you say it would take me to dig this 5 acres with my spade?

doganjo

  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Clackmannanshire
  • Qui? Moi?
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2011, 12:22:47 am »

fertilised eggs can be eaten, assuming they are fresh & kept cool!


And supposedly lower in cholesterol than un-fertilised eggs 
Why?  I can't see the logic in that. ???
Always have been, always will be, a WYSIWYG - black is black, white is white - no grey in my life! But I'm mellowing in my old age

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2011, 12:36:04 am »
That would be good - I ate a lot of eggs last year!

Hatty

  • Joined Feb 2011
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2011, 06:40:34 am »

fertilised eggs can be eaten, assuming they are fresh & kept cool!


And supposedly lower in cholesterol than un-fertilised eggs 
Why?  I can't see the logic in that. ???


was just something I remembered hearing but I had a rummage round on tinternent thingy and your right!!  found a really interesting egg site though  http://www.incredibleegg.org/
its from the US but interesting
How long did you say it would take me to dig this 5 acres with my spade?

shetlandpaul

  • Joined Oct 2008
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2011, 08:55:58 am »
how. there is one cell diffrence. have you not heard eggs are good for you now. plus most cholesterol is body made and not diet related.
the only reason for seperating the meat and layers is as been said they have diffrent dietry requirements.

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2011, 01:07:20 pm »
Thanks for the replies;

All I've got to do now is make sure I've got what I need in place to hatch eggs (don't have a broody hen) and choose a type from available egg sources... Why are there SOOO many types of chicken??  :)

m

jaykay

  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Cumbria/N Yorks border
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2011, 02:17:26 pm »
Easiest thing is to raise 'old-fashioned' dual purpose birds like Susexes and Wyandottes. They're pretty, the girls lay well and the boys grow to eaten at about 5 months. You keep them all together and feed them the same  :) Of course, not as many eggs as modern hybrids nor oven-ready in 10 weeks. But you pays your money and makes your choice  ;)

It-needed-a-home

  • Joined Apr 2011
  • Aberdeenshire
  • Zeus (our saxony duck)
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2011, 07:15:00 pm »
Hi mab tried toreply but wouldnt let me i have very good packing system so no problem there 10 pounds + post 5 pound 12 eggs more available if you need

Cheers shout me by email
Well i have cut back and i still have to many !!!! Oh well just as well i love them !!

Anke

  • Joined Dec 2009
  • St Boswells, Scottish Borders
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2011, 02:38:51 pm »
getting meat chickens as day-olds saves you a full three weeks, and no problems if hatchrate is low. They are usually just about 1 to 2 pounds per bird! Why would you want to hatch your own?

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: silly question - probably
« Reply #13 on: June 11, 2011, 12:59:53 pm »
I never thought of that - oh well I've got 'em & the old incubator's running now.  ;D

m

 

© The Accidental Smallholder Ltd 2003-2025. All rights reserved.

Design by Furness Internet

Site developed by Champion IS