Hopefully the vet told you that the test for Johnes for a single sheep is extremely unreliable; a +ve is a +ve but a -ve does not necessarily mean it's not Johnes.
You can read our highly unsatisfactory story about Johnes - or not - in our sheep here
No, the vet didn't say the test for Johnes was unreliable, but it' a mixed practice and the sheep vet who took the blood is on holiday, so I am dealing with small animal vets till he gets back. Also, the fact that the blood tests did show some liver damage that would account for weight loss, and liver damage isn't associated with Johnes.
Thanks for the link to your thread about Johnes. I have read the whole thing,and after thinking there are similarities with Acorn, I see your ewe definitely didn't have Johnes after all. She's the right age-- 4 years old-- and otherwise seems bright and normal. She isn't emaciated --- yet-- sheep vet who took blood body scored her at 2.5. Since I don't breed, and reading on the NADIS site it's unlikely she would infect the adult sheep running with her, I may as well give her some time and extra feed, even if Johnes is a possibility. .