I know a lot of people on here have found that prolapsers are repeat offenders but my own experience had been largely different.
Ooo this sounds promising. Can you share more?
If you do a search for 'prolapse' by 'SallyIntNorth' in 'Sheep', you'll get the stories many times!
Here's a selection of the times I've written about it:
https://www.accidentalsmallholder.net/forum/index.php?topic=50327.msg441006#msg441006https://www.accidentalsmallholder.net/forum/index.php?topic=57168.msg484367#msg484367https://www.accidentalsmallholder.net/forum/index.php?topic=57147.msg484204#msg484204 One of the things which has occurred to me as I looked through these old posts is that when a ewe has been carrying stupidly large lambs, it behooves us (anyway, but especially if she prolapsed during pregnancy) to think about why her lambs were so large. Often it's tup genetics, feeding or other management, so we can address that, and see that we have a reason to think she would not struggle similarly again. But if it seems to be the ewe's genetics, then I'd say cull, every time, and don't keep her daughters on either.
But one factor I think about a lot is getting sufficient nutriment into the ewe as her lambs grow, without forcing her to eat lots of bulky forage. So if the lambs are likely to be large (and or plentiful
), give her plenty of cake, sugar in non bulky form (eg molasses), etc.
When we had Swaledale Mules going to a good Beltex tup, we were advised that by the final month of gestation we should be giving them both cake and hay twice a day, so that they could take on the nutrients they needed in two sessions rather than trying to cram it all in in one.