I can talk, from personal experience, about Texel, Beltex, Dutch Texel and Charollais. They will grow, and finish, without cake (and we're Severely Disadvantaged Cumbrian upland here), but would take slightly longer and might not hit quite such high grades.
People get hung up about head size, but head size isn't the issue. Shoulders and bums are (or can be) the issue. With the breeds in your mix, there's no reason to think your ewes would have narrow birth canals or pelvises, so you're unlikely to have problems, provided you don't cake single-bearers and don't overdo the cake for others.
(We've lambed more than 40 Mules so far this year, and over 50 Texel and other types. All to Texel and Texel x Beltex tups. We had to assist two of the Mules; one had one coming backwards, and the other was a large single - we don't scan and they had all been caked for 7 weeks before lambing.)
We've had two Charollais tups, and all their lambs were very easy lambed, active at birth, grew well, hit target weights and conformation quicker than their Texel and Beltex cross peers. The 'skin' (fleece) is thinner, and you may need to be able to bring ewes in and/or jacket lambs in vile weather. We were advised to get a tup with plenty of wool on his head, as his lambs would be less bare, and we did find that to be the case.
We don't have Charollais tups now, as we kept a lot of the daughters on as breeders, so a Charollais on our ewes now would give too thin a skin for a Cumbrian upland outdoor lambing.
If the Dutch Texel hadn't been anglicised I would recommend one of them. Small lambs, very active, finer skins so easier lambed, but fast-growing and able to do on grass. However, last time we shopped for a Dutch Texel tup we found them to have been bred to be overlarge, almost indistinguishable from the Texel, so didn't want to risk it.
Someone will be along soon to sing the praises of the Charmoise...