Author Topic: MP's Expenses  (Read 46998 times)

northfifeduckling

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Fife
    • North Fife Blog
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #30 on: May 19, 2009, 10:21:36 pm »
put nicely to the point, Russ
I got really mad when GB announced during an 11 course dinner with his "mates" that we all should avoid food waste -  yes, that's the right moment to tell us, dear! :&>

Old Empty Barn

  • Joined Feb 2009
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #31 on: May 19, 2009, 10:32:47 pm »
Sellickbhoy, I must check & see if he is also our MP ......... if he is I'll be popping into Linlithgow to see Cagney & Lacey ! ............ seems like a straightforward case of fraud to me !

sellickbhoy

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Muiravonside, near Linlithgow
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #32 on: May 19, 2009, 10:50:13 pm »
yeah, i think he is OEB


sellickbhoy

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Muiravonside, near Linlithgow
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #33 on: May 20, 2009, 10:07:30 am »
My favourite MP is back in the news again today - what a pity!

A SCOTTISH Labour MP was last night asked to explain why he billed the taxpayer £250 for an alarm clock.
Michael Connarty, the MP for Linlithgow and Falkirk East, bought the radio alarm clock from electrical retailer Comet. But the claim has raised eyebrows as there does not appear to be any alarm clock available for the price. The most expensive one currently available at Comet costs £199.

Elsewhere, the top of the range Sunrise Alarm Clock, which includes a built in stereo MP3 player and personalised dawn to dusk light simulation, costs just £115.

The only alarm clock advertised as more expensive than Mr Connarty's was a stainless steel leather-bound one available from the Queen's jewellers,Asprey, for £750.

Mr Connarty was unavailable for comment yesterday because he was leading a delegation of MPs to Stockholm.

Susie Squire from the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "This is a staggering amount to pay for an alarm clock, but it is indicative of what MPs have been doing. Mr Connarty and his colleagues need to explain themselves to the people who elected them."

Mr Connarty also claimed £1,099 for a plasma television from John Lewis and £299 on a Panasonic TV stand in 2008. A year before he claimed £69.99 for a freeview box and £379.99 for a television.

He faced further questions about the sale of his flat to neighbouring Labour MP Jim Devine in 2007 when he moved in with the MP for Glasgow South Ian Davidson. Part of the sale to Mr Devine, who was also unavailable for comment, included £4,000 for furniture in the flat, including £1,000 for a sofa bed.

Mr Devine then claimed all the money back, even though the only valuation was made by the two MPs. Mr Connarty has also been asked to explain why he made £2,181 of claims for household goods for a second home while he shared a flat with Mr Davidson for 11 months.

During this period he claimed for mortgage interest.

In January 2007 he also claimed £1,114.75 for a bed frame which was bought in Falkirk and delivered to his constituency home, which was not his designated second home. He also claimed £149 for a footstool and £649 from Reid's for the same address. There were also questions about another bed he bought in Glasgow which was then delivered to an address in the city, even though it is not his constituency.

After buying his own new second home in London for £365,000, he started claiming £1,700 a month for his mortgage interest.

Labour's whips office has also been caught up in the controversy. Watford MP Claire Ward claimed £1,150 in petty cash over eight months; Dudley North MP Ian Austin submitted two claims for stamp duty of £6,770 and £1,344; and Dawn Butler, the MP for Brent South, claimed £2,650 for a central heating system and £2,308 for a Whirlpool bath suite.

Hull North MP Diana Johnson claimed £1,000 for an architect's services, and Birmingham Hall MP Steve McCabe over claimed on his mortgage by £4,059.

Edinburgh North and Leith MP Mark Lazarowicz has offered to pay back some expenses before the details of his claims have even come out.

Hogg to go

DOUGLAS Hogg, the Tory MP whose claim for clearing the moat at his country estate came to symbolise the excesses of MPs' expenses, is to stand down at the next general election.

He said he was making clear his intentions to give his local constituency party in Lincolnshire time to select a candidate for the election.

"I entirely understand the public anger that has erupted over expenses," he conceded. "The current system is deeply flawed; we parliamentarians have got it wrong and I apologise for that failure.

"In view of David Cameron's campaign for an early election – which I strongly support – I have decided that now is the time to (say] I will not be standing in the coming election."

Mr Hogg, a former agriculture minister, argued that he had not actually claimed for the £2,200 bill for clearing the moat at his estate. But he later agreed to pay back the money after accepting that it had not been "positively excluded" from paperwork submitted in support of his allowances claim for upkeep of the estate.

sandy

  • Guest
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #34 on: May 20, 2009, 10:31:20 am »
I can just see loads of MPs now trying to conjure up some other crisis to take the heat from them, I doubt the European Elections will have mush of a turnout!!! Am I missing something or am I being too sceptical, I cannot see the benefits of  the government giving money if you trade in an old car for a new one, I thought we were trying to cut down on waste and energy and surely, it takes lots of natural recourses and energy to produce a car!   Also, where are people suppose to get the rest of the money for a new car from? The message that comes across to me is borrow some more money even though we are not sure of our jobs, yet, recycle your rubbish and do not use carrier bags just buy plastic bags for your rubbish!!! I know the car industry is needing the extra trade but a lot of industries have seen declines, what about the building trade? Where I live now a lot of industry has disappeared, mining, wool mills, breweries etc but, things are always changing due to demand and of course production.  I went of politics years ago when I remembered local MP’s from being at school with me, most were show offs who just liked their own voices, I know there must be some genuine ones!!!!!! And of the subject of expenses, I remembered being challenged for claiming a mile extra as I added up the mileage wrong!!!!! All of something like 48p and my expenses for food and entertaining were very tightly capped and rightly so. I have thought all along the MP’s should have capped expenses and given the option of a flat to stay in when away from their home, I am sure the cost of converting a disused building and making it high security would be much fairer to all us tax payers..anyway, sorry for my rant but I need to have some clarity as I am not sure what is going on other than corruption!!!!!!! Phewwwwwwwwwwwww!

Audmum

  • Joined Apr 2009
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #35 on: May 20, 2009, 12:58:17 pm »
Someone wrote into a daily paper a while back and suggested that after the olympics the village should be turned over to the government and used by MP's when they're in London.  I think that's a brill idea and would do away with the need for second home allowances.

doganjo

  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Clackmannanshire
  • Qui? Moi?
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #36 on: May 20, 2009, 01:00:55 pm »
Too right - the whole thing proves that most of our current MPs are corrupt - the thing that worries me though is that they don't think they are - they are all blaming "The System"
Always have been, always will be, a WYSIWYG - black is black, white is white - no grey in my life! But I'm mellowing in my old age

jameslindsay

  • Joined Feb 2009
  • Nr St Andrews, Fife
  • "Blossom" one of my Pygmy Goats
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #37 on: May 20, 2009, 01:13:31 pm »
Someone wrote into a daily paper a while back and suggested that after the olympics the village should be turned over to the government and used by MP's when they're in London.  I think that's a brill idea and would do away with the need for second home allowances.

If Joe Bloggs, general public, takes a job in say Inverness when his home is Alloa - he takes the job on the understanding that it involves staying away from home  and had to pay for any accommodation himself. MP's know if elected they will have to stay in London, give them nothing!!

sandy

  • Guest
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #38 on: May 20, 2009, 01:16:42 pm »
Mutiny...where are the Pirate smilies?

sellickbhoy

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Muiravonside, near Linlithgow
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #39 on: May 20, 2009, 01:19:50 pm »
Someone wrote into a daily paper a while back and suggested that after the olympics the village should be turned over to the government and used by MP's when they're in London.  I think that's a brill idea and would do away with the need for second home allowances.

If Joe Bloggs, general public, takes a job in say Inverness when his home is Alloa - he takes the job on the understanding that it involves staying away from home  and had to pay for any accommodation himself. MP's know if elected they will have to stay in London, give them nothing!!

don't necessarily agree with that one - plenty of people have jobs which involves travelling and staying away from home and their employer foots the bill for travel, accommodation and meals

I do think the best thing would be for the government to simply open a hotel across the street from the parliament. It would be exclusively for MP's and civil servants.

they could then control the costs/expenses/security and there would be no excuse for them not making it into parliament to do their job

If they choose to rent their own place, then they pay for it - simples.


northfifeduckling

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Fife
    • North Fife Blog
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #40 on: May 20, 2009, 05:47:03 pm »
portacabins - posh ones, of course :&>

Crofter

  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Isle of Lewis
  • We'll get there!
    • Ravenstar
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #41 on: May 20, 2009, 07:44:16 pm »
Not even posh ones!  They are only "famous" because we elected them, they're supposed to be there to serve us, not us to serve them ??? ???
Comfortable B&B on a working Croft on the Isle of Lewis. www.Ravenstar.co.uk

doganjo

  • Joined Aug 2012
  • Clackmannanshire
  • Qui? Moi?
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #42 on: May 20, 2009, 10:28:14 pm »
There's an awful lot of hot feelings about this situation.  These elections next month are going to be very interesting.  I won't vote for the BNP because of their reputation - probably don't have a candidate anyway, but won't vote for any of the main parties - except maybe SNP.  Perhaps UKIP will do well.
Always have been, always will be, a WYSIWYG - black is black, white is white - no grey in my life! But I'm mellowing in my old age

jameslindsay

  • Joined Feb 2009
  • Nr St Andrews, Fife
  • "Blossom" one of my Pygmy Goats
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #43 on: May 20, 2009, 10:33:32 pm »
I did not realise that the information the Daily Telegraph is releasing daily was actually handed to them 5 years ago and the only reason it has only come to light now is that the Speaker (who resigned yesterday and whose name escapes me) took the Newspaper to the High Court to stop the information becoming public. The 5 year law suit incidentally paid by you and me - the tax payer. Anyway, he/the governemnet lost the case and the rest as they say is hostory. The thieving git deserves all he gets and I hope that all the others get kicked out and humiliated too.

The ironoc thing is, if this case has been dragged through the court for 5 years , every Party Leader who has stood up in public over the last few days and said they have just discovered what has been going and and they are horrified - well are they not LIARS too, No ????

jameslindsay

  • Joined Feb 2009
  • Nr St Andrews, Fife
  • "Blossom" one of my Pygmy Goats
Re: MP's Expenses
« Reply #44 on: May 20, 2009, 10:37:37 pm »
I actually fear quite scary time ahead - politically. There seems little doubt that the general public are going to accept the crap that Gordon Brown etc. is hurling at us so change will happen. Time will tell. Good on Esther Rantzen, I believe she will make an excellent MP and good old Anne Widdecomb didn't even claim things she was supposed to. They say she is squeeky clean so well done Ms Widdecomb.

As for the European Elections, other than receive our Ballot Papers we have had nothing to tell us about who is standing so guess I won't be voting. I guess though now is the time to vote and let the buggers in Downing St feel the peoples anger,

 

© The Accidental Smallholder Ltd 2003-2025. All rights reserved.

Design by Furness Internet

Site developed by Champion IS