Author Topic: public rights of way  (Read 15643 times)

manian

  • Joined Sep 2010
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #15 on: February 08, 2012, 07:21:43 pm »
yep you are responsible
we have a bridleway ::) through ours. we have fenced the animals so that people can't touch the animals
check for any specifics to your ROW and get it in writing from the coucil
also get info about any problems from te seller. if any problem found out later then have some come back if in writing

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2012, 09:47:30 pm »
Well I talked to the ROW officer and it's foot traffic only on the path only, and dogs should be on short leads, and she confirmed the route as that on the OS map.

Not worked out any details yet but fencing the path off would fence the animals away from the stream.

lachlanandmarcus

  • Joined Aug 2010
  • Aberdeenshire
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2012, 10:30:27 pm »
lots of farmers are being made to fence off their animals from watercourses anyway (water can still feed troughs but not directly accessed (altho more cattle than smaller things) due to the pollution and bank habitat erosion they cause. Esp on nitrate vulnerable zones which are covering an increasing area of the country.

Not saying thats relevant here but its worth bearing in mind that if you did decide to fence you would get tick in that box from big brother.

bazzais

  • Joined Jan 2010
    • Allt Y Coed Farm and Campsite
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #18 on: March 01, 2012, 05:09:25 am »
I actually feel quite good now about the Pembrokeshire National Parks - they have upgraded most my gates that are on footpaths and kept all the stiles intact.  We only have one gate now that we are trying to get them to change to the fasteners on as they installed a 'pin' latch which the ponies bend with one scratch of the arse.

The dog opening stile thingy is actually easier to make than it sounds - I would post a picture but when I searched for 'dog stile' on google images it came up with some rather, lets say, different results.

Baz

mab

  • Joined Mar 2009
  • carmarthenshire
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #19 on: March 02, 2012, 12:44:34 am »
 ;D ;D ;D

Well there's already a new looking stile for humans so I just need to add a doggy door on one side. I should be able to manage.

But the ROW officer did say I was responsible for the stiles & fences and they were responsible for the path - but then this is Carmarthenshire so I suppose they have different rules.  :(


SallyintNorth

  • Joined Feb 2011
  • Cornwall
  • Rarely short of an opinion but I mean well
    • Trelay Cohousing Community
Re: public rights of way
« Reply #20 on: March 02, 2012, 09:48:00 pm »
I think the legality is that the landowner is responsible for the paths including gates, stiles, etc, but some National Parks take a wider view and are happy to help maintain / improve paths for the good of the visitors and the farmers.  Northumberland National Park certainly do.
Don't listen to the money men - they know the price of everything and the value of nothing

Live in a cohousing community with small farm for our own use.  Dairy cows (rearing their own calves for beef), pigs, sheep for meat and fleece, ducks and hens for eggs, veg and fruit growing

 

© The Accidental Smallholder Ltd 2003-2025. All rights reserved.

Design by Furness Internet

Site developed by Champion IS