To be honest i don't see anything wrong here??
The aim of the Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products Directive is to ensure that this latter group of herbal remedies meets basic safety and quality standards - i.e. they should not be watered down, or contain contaminants or cheap substitute ingredients. They will also have to demonstrate their efficacy through "traditional use" i.e. through being on the market for 30 years - 15 years of which must be in Europe. In addition, any medical claims they make must be accurate.
It would be good to know you won't be putting yourself and family at any risk or wasting your money. Opium is traditional, I know it's not herbal but so is Rhino horn. I personally need to know anything take or apply is fit for purpose. Some things like clove oil, eucalyptus, menthol, witchhazel etc have been used for years and have been proven to work. The things that need to be controlled are some of the more fadish Chinese treatments and the like; some are poisonous and affect the heart and nervous system. Others have been tested and found to contain dangerous levels of heavy metals like lead and arsenic.
I could go on the internet any time and buy a cocktail of toxic so called traditional medicines of unknown origin. They could contain anything and I wouldn't know. Is this right?