"If I were KC I would be fummeing you do what YOU think is right"
I am more laid back than that and fummeing is so smoky!

The shorthand of "madness" from Berkshire Boy, instead of "you have a different view of this" said it all really

I understand the other view, and you invite it when you post a thread.
I don't accept
(a) A disabled animal has less value and should be euthanised first before healthy animals.... the outcome of that would be the, very, inhumane, result that cruelty leading to disability was then followed by death. Is that the only restitution we can make to these animals?
(b) That British dogs have more value and there is some national league table of rehoming they jump to the top of
(c) That money should always be spent in the most economically regenerative way, i.e, that £200 would help rehome or care for 2 or 3 dogs here..... I think there is no absolute list of how you allocate resource, economics is obviously one factor ...but so is need and kindness.
And I think the BB approach is based on a idealised economic model of supply and demand that doesn't work. If I don't take Terry, it doesn't mean I would take a dog from a UK rescue... in fact, I probably wouldn't. Terry has touched my heart and made me willing to inconvenience my life a little to find a place for him in it (and get a MASSIVE return from him), other dogs who are in shelters that I haven't come into contact with, don't make me want to do that.
My point is I AM EXCITED ABOUT TERRY
