In 30 years of sheep keeping I have rarely found a maggot wound (fly strike) to get infected and in fact the above article in Scientific American confirms this.
Not quite. The article notes that maggots are being used as a method of debriding some wounds and that they may do something that modulates the immune response in addition to eating dead tissue. However that is a very different set of circumstances to maggots causing fly strike and the ensuing conditions.
The maggots used in wound care are sterile - they have been hatched in sterile conditions and are provided in sterile packaging then applied to a wound which is often being kept very clean. The patient is often on antimicrobial treatment too already. Very different to maggots that are hatching from eggs laid in fleece by flies that have just been trotting about on faeces in the field, where such maggots then start eating healthy flesh and cause the wound, which is exposed to the elements and multiple sources of contamination.
The other point about decades of experience not showing up an infection caused by strike is more important though. This is about risk and making a judgement.
In humans if we get a cut, even one with some muck in it from the garden, we don't start antibiotics in case it might get infected - they are unnecessary. If however that wound is much worse, seriously contaminated, or is a wound type very likely to become infected (like a deep puncture wound from a cat bite say), then we probably should. If the wound is in an individual at high risk of infection, perhaps due to immunosuppressive drugs, then maybe we would.
We should apply the same logic to sheep who after all also possess pretty good immune systems. So a minor case of strike in an otherwise healthy individual, caught quickly maybe doesn't need routine treatment with antibiotics. A more extensive case found later in a very young or very old sheep who isn't in great condition, perhaps does.
To reach for an antibiotic at the slightest possibility of infection is not good practice nowadays as antibiotic resistance is now a very real problem.
Completely agree and every single use adds to the risk. Resistance is not a reason not to use antibiotics at all but it absolutely is a reason to use them judiciously.