The Accidental Smallholder Forum

Smallholding => Renewables => Topic started by: bucketman on April 29, 2011, 08:23:50 am

Title: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on April 29, 2011, 08:23:50 am
Morning
Got some guy coming round next Thur's 5th to do a survey to see if or roof is the right spec to put panels on. This is brought on because of the buy back scheme. Just wondering have any of the people on this site got them or know any thing about them. We will be buying these, its not a rent a roof thing. So the outlay is quite large 12 to 15k. The firm reckon I will get back about £100 a month, so it will take about 10 yrs to pay for themselves
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bazzais on April 29, 2011, 10:54:24 am
Yes I have signed up for something similar am just waiting for permission from the parks to say I dont need permission, if you get what I mean - normally takes around six months they think.

My only concern is whether my roof will last as long as the panels :)

All in all it sounds like a great investment as long as the roof doesnt go wrong or the panels fail in any way.

The company I am using uses an insurance backed deposit scheme as they do want the money up front.

Ta

Barry
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: ambriel on April 29, 2011, 11:00:04 am

Yeah, I'd like to put PV panels on the roof, too, but can't afford the outlay.

Our house runs east-west so one whole roof is south facing - ought to be ideal.

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Fleecewife on April 29, 2011, 11:17:58 am
We looked into the various options including wind turbine (they're popping up all over the place round here) but decided in the end that we won't live long enough to get back the outlay and that it will be cheaper and as effective to improve the insulation in our house.  We both hate double glazing but have decided to go for it on the north side of the house.  For a pv array we would have to get our lovely slate roof completely rebuilt before it could take the weight, and we wouln't be able to see it afterwards for the ugly big panels.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: doganjo on April 29, 2011, 01:45:27 pm
I've had one quote, awaiting two more - £12K so far, but the firm I bought my log burner from want to get into this market so I have given them the quote so they can possibly come up with a better one.  They might well outlive me too, but £1000 income a year ain't bad, and the value of the house should improve.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Rosemary on April 29, 2011, 02:58:10 pm
We have a 4kW PV array on our barn. Got an interest free loan over 8 years to cover cost of installation plus income form every kW generated. Can recommend SolarTechnologies, Tom Morley, in Edinburgh. Sun keep shining  ;D
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on April 29, 2011, 06:35:17 pm
I know the out lay is big will either hit are rainy day fund or get a loan on the house (luckily no mortgage on house at the moment ) So it seems good plus its GREEN. So the plan get a mortgage over 10 years pay it of with money we would put aside to retire then for 15 more years after that get £100+ a month pension. If all that makes sense
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bazzais on April 29, 2011, 08:39:18 pm
I am not sure its 'green' if you look at how they are produced, from what and where - but it is an attractive investment with the subsidy if you have the initial money to outlay.

Ta

Baz

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: goosepimple on April 29, 2011, 08:48:20 pm
If you've got an old property they may open cans of worms of things wrong with your roof you didn't know about - lots of roofs are just not strong enough structurally to cope with the loading - but then they've probably been tested by snow this past couple of winters so I would imagine any signs of stress would show up now.  Make sure the survey is sound and not borderline.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Anke on April 29, 2011, 09:17:23 pm
Yes - but snow AND solar panels may just prove too much!
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on April 30, 2011, 08:33:09 am
The people i spoke to said "if the panels added more than 15% to the weight of the roof they would sell me them. The guy coming round will only do survey. Then pass info on to sales team and we will take it from there. Will ring them and ask if they think we will need planning. the bungalow we live doesn't have any shadows on the roof and was built in the 60s all the tiles look sound to me. So fingers crossed should be OK. the quote we got says it will cost about £14k and we should get back about £1400 per year
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: doganjo on April 30, 2011, 11:05:31 am
The people i spoke to said "if the panels added more than 15% to the weight of the roof they would sell me them. The guy coming round will only do survey. Then pass info on to sales team and we will take it from there. Will ring them and ask if they think we will need planning. the bungalow we live doesn't have any shadows on the roof and was built in the 60s all the tiles look sound to me. So fingers crossed should be OK. the quote we got says it will cost about £14k and we should get back about £1400 per year
rob
Don't just get one quote - there are loads of people doing these.  My quote(and only one so far as I'm waiting for the others to come) was £12k and £1k annual return, so they vary a great deal - mine is a fully south facing 4 bedroom bungalow.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: suziequeue on April 30, 2011, 11:20:07 am
We are rebuilding our house in order to make it more energy efficient (it would be impossible - based on it's current design and build - to make any effective changes to improve efficiency in the long term and the house is ugly and too small anyway!!).

We will have a ground source heat pump to supply underfloor heating, very efficient glazing and insulation, solar panels on the roof of the house and 8kW of PVs on the roof of the workshop.

We will NEVER get our money back but that's not why I'm doing it.

I want peace of mind with regard to energy and heating and I expect - when we come to sell our house in 20 - 30 years time (when we're too old and arthritic to run it to its full potential), properties that are self-sufficient in energy production may well fetch a premium.

However, just in case I am increasing my collection of cute little oil lamps  :D
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: ambriel on April 30, 2011, 02:05:29 pm
However, just in case I am increasing my collection of cute little oil lamps  :D
Glad it's not just me, then. Not oil lamps but other non-electric alternatives to what we use now, like hand-cranked mincers.

I was reading-up about PV panels recently and they do use some pretty exotic elements to make them work. Can't remember the specifics but I do recall the article said that if people went in to it in a large scale way then pretty soon the planet's reserves of some of these elements would be exhausted.

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: shearling on April 30, 2011, 03:01:07 pm
We have photvoltaic tiles on our roof. They are in a sheet but meld in extremely well with the slates. AS well as being attractively belended in they are also not as heavy as solas panels
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: SallyintNorth on April 30, 2011, 03:51:33 pm
Glad it's not just me, then. Not oil lamps but other non-electric alternatives to what we use now, like hand-cranked mincers.

No, not just you.  I saw, at a scything festival, a pedal-powered smoothie-maker and was inspired.  Sadly the inspiration can't make me able to create anything like that, but I just love the idea of using pedal power (or I wouldn't mind getting me a turnspit dog!) to do things we now think need a 13A plug.  In my dreams, someone makes and markets the adapted exercise bike with a universal connector thingy and we can all use it to churn our butter, liquidise our soups, etc etc etc.

One of my green thinker friends uses the reversal of, "We used to use horses walking round and round to mill our flour, now we plug in an electric horse walker to exercise our horses", to demonstrate just how far we have gone in the wrong direction.  Sadly I can see on the faces of the people who hear this that the only ones who 'get it' are those of a green bent already.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: suziequeue on April 30, 2011, 07:17:44 pm
I have a book called The Human-powered Home by Tamara Dean - published by New Society Publishers.

It's really interesting.

I am keen to make a pedal-powered apple scratter
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Norfolk Newby on May 01, 2011, 09:09:17 am
I am sceptical about the current range of solar cells. On the one hand they are very expensive for the electricity they produce and on the other, their life expectancy can be short.

Research is making them more efficient (20% is possible) and/or cheaper to make. There are two main sorts. One is called polycrystalline and the other amorphous silicon.

If you want a high performance long life solar panel it is better to be polycrystalline silicon. This is what is used on satellites. It give the most power and has the best life but it is expensive (OK on a satellite but expensive for the roof). On satellites they last for about 10 years with some degradation along the way. Space is a very aggressive environment so this is understandable. On Earth they might last 20 years before being reduced to junk.

The amorphous silicon are cheaper to make but life can be short - less than 10 years.

All this is from me looking around the internet etc. So it may not be 100% and the cells are getting better as new manufacturing techniques come along so don't let me put you off the idea if you have mortgaged the farm to get some installed.

For me, I might get a small panel put in as a test sometime in the next 5 years. Meanwhile, I have a 2Kw petrol generator as a standby.

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: ambriel on May 03, 2011, 11:58:22 pm
Meanwhile, I have a 2Kw petrol generator as a standby.
Likewise, but petrol ain't getting any cheaper...

As a nation we need to drastically reduce our electricity consumption. I'm as bad as anyone - there are four PCs here and in my office that are *never* turned off. I suppose if I had to I could reduce that to two - that's in addition to the laptop I'm using now, btw.

Look at motorway lights - do we really need them all? Cars have been equipped with headlights for as long as there have been cars, after all. Do the streetlights stay on all night? I'll have to check.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: mab on May 04, 2011, 01:00:52 am
If you're looking into an on-grid 'feed in tariff' system I probably can't tell you much.

I've got a home built off-grid system and know a bit about solar panels, but I don't think you need to know much about the panels for an on-grid system.

For info there's another type of panel: Monocrystalline - these generally have the highest output per unit area, followed by polycrystalline, and then amorphous/thin-film. In terms of price per watt: mono was highest and amorphous lowest about 2 years ago, but mono have come down in price by a factor of two since then. Some of the amorphous are poor quality and best avoided; others are guaranteed as long as the crystalline types. The picture (if it has attached ok), shows my panels. the two inner ones are thin-film type, 64 watt each and guaranteed for 20 years; the outer two are monocrystalline 80watt each.

I'm not totally off-grid, but I try to stay within my solar supply - my mains electricity bill for last winter was £28  ;D (cooker, immersion & washing machine).

mab

PS. Ambriel, a PC typically uses between 100 and 200w (not including the monitor, printer routers or anything else). taking 120w for a small one and 15p/unit that's 2 units/ day = £220 per year per PC  :o . You might want to re-consider turning them off - or replace them with laptops - or, next time you upgrade one, ask for a high efficiency PSU.

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: SallyintNorth on May 04, 2011, 08:05:53 am
mab, that was fascinating!  How much power does a laptop consume (if left plugged in and turned on)?
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Dizzycow on May 04, 2011, 09:03:18 am
Does anyone know of a reputable scottish firm who will do the pv under the 'rent my roof' system?
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: ellisr on May 04, 2011, 05:18:05 pm
I work for a company that makes the only solar slate in the UK and they cannot be seen on the roof. They are fitted like slates and are now being allowed in heritage sites where before no solar technology was allowed unless it could be completely hidden out of site.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: mab on May 04, 2011, 05:44:26 pm
Quote
How much power does a laptop consume (if left plugged in and turned on)?

Hmm, well that does depend very much on what size and processor spec and what it's doing;

My 17" 1.6GHz acer laptop uses about 28w when on and idle. The actual power also depends a lot on what it's doing - using the processor intensively and operating the hard drive can raise the consumption by 30% (e.g. viruscan). If I turn off the display backlight it goes down by about 8W. The mains power supply (which I rarely use) uses an additional 5w which comes out as heat.

Hypothetically, if it was left on 24/7 doing random things I would guess it would consume about 40W average (including mains adaptor) = £73/year (at the above rate); If the backlight was turned off for much of the time it was left that might bring the cost down to £45ish.

I also have a 2GHz 13" macbook - this uses 25-50w depending on what it's doing. turning off the airport (wireless card) saves about 3W. If the macbook's turned off but the power supply is left plugged in (with the battery fully charged) it uses 4.5w and just the PSU disconnected from the macbook uses 3w.

the router uses ~6w; if left on 24/7 that would be about £11/year.

small notebook type units with small displays and long battery life might be significantly better, but I don't have one to test.

mab
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: SallyintNorth on May 05, 2011, 04:52:08 pm
Wow, thanks for all of that, mab. 

I am disgusted that the manufacturers are still allowed to make PSUs that consume when not being used, but my laptop is pretty much either turned off at the mains or on and connected to the mains, so that won't affect me.

I keep my wireless off so that will help but despite good intentions do not very often turn off overnight and just keep it plugged into the mains.  Mind, I am very good at always putting the laptop in 'sleep' mode when I leave it and I nearly always remember to unplug the internet connection.  Antivirus will still do things but otherwise it should be quiet while I am not actively using it.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on May 05, 2011, 08:35:17 pm
The has guy been round and we're looking at a 12k investment with a £1250 per yr return. The real figures work out about 11.6% so about 8.5 and 9 yrs to pay for its self then £1250 for the rest of the 25yrs all indexed linked. So at todays prices its £12k outlay and 300 months x £104 = £31400 return not bad. wonder what the banks would give
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: shearling on May 05, 2011, 09:04:53 pm
Mmmm. We are on FITs and have been waiting nearly a year for the first payment. The reason change of ownership of the house. very interesting process. Also the electric firms ask for quarterly readings and then pay - so they say - within 90 days. ::)
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: doganjo on May 05, 2011, 10:27:20 pm
The has guy been round and we're looking at a 12k investment with a £1250 per yr return. The real figures work out about 11.6% so about 8.5 and 9 yrs to pay for its self then £1250 for the rest of the 25yrs all indexed linked. So at todays prices its £12k outlay and 300 months x £104 = £31400 return not bad. wonder what the banks would give
rob
Don't know what they said to you, but I was told the scheme started a couple of years go and that now the remaining number of years guaranteed by the Government is down to 22.
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on May 06, 2011, 06:35:05 pm
Quote
Don't know what they said to you, but I was told the scheme started a couple of years go and that now the remaining number of years guaranteed by the Government is down to 22
Spoke to them and both of us are half right
1 what ever year you sign up you get that tariff for 25 yrs indexed linked
but
2 the latter you sign up you get a smaller tariff so if you left it for 23 yrs you would only get free electice and a small pay back for any leccy you don't use
The FITS is to get people to sign up sooner rather than latter.
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: ambriel on May 06, 2011, 10:06:08 pm

Yes that sounds about right, mab. The electrickery bill for the office runs to around £230/quarter. I do switch off the printers and monitors but two of the PCs have to stay on because they're receiving data 24/7. I might try and consolidate them into one PC when I get some spare time.

Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: bucketman on May 09, 2011, 08:05:12 pm
we'll here goes about to sign for them £10.5k. Buying solar panels with rainy day fund. How ironic is that
rob
Title: Re: Solar panels
Post by: Dan on May 09, 2011, 09:58:45 pm
we'll here goes about to sign for them £10.5k. Buying solar panels with rainy day fund. How ironic is that
rob

 :D

If you can afford the capital it's a no-brainer. We put a 3.96kW array on our barn when we moved here. It cost £15k to install, and we got an interest-free loan for some of it from EST.

I'm not completely obsessed (yet), but did pop out this evening to see how much we'd generated today - 22.76kW by about 7pm = about £10 for the day from the FIT, plus the free electricity. It's been a fairly sunny day, am looking forward to seeing what its peak output is in summer.

In April we generated 456 kW in 27 days, an average of £7 income per day from the FIT.

We've got an efergy meter too, so we can see what we're using. It *really* concentrates the mind to how much electricity you're consuming right now.